Virtual Memory Allocation
I love it when smells and tastes trigger memories long buried in my brain. Sometimes these relationships can be pretty random.
The taste of chokecherry jelly = flashbacks of me of playing in the work room in my old house.
Burning plastic = flashbacks of sitting on shag carpet playing Link.
Running outside in the fall = flashbacks of Skyway City (From City of Heroes)
That last one is different because it is a memory of a virtual place. You'd think that somehow my brain would treat it differently. But no... Memories of the digital world are treated exactly like any other. For some reason this only started happening when games switched to 3d. Perhaps something about our brains is wired to memorize 3d spatial information in a different way, even if it is virtual. How easily fooled we are!
As videogames become more immerse they will require the use of more subconscious skills that have been handed down to us by evolution. It started with basic hand eye coordination and basic competition. (Pong) Then came memory, intuition, logic, problem solving. Soon after came RPGs with character development thus tapping into our emotions. Things went 3d and started tapping into our brain's ability to visualize, memorize and interpret 3d environments. Sound designers began tapping into our brain's ability unconsciously model 3D directionality.
With the invention of MMORPGs the complexities of interpersonal relationships, and group dynamic were added to the equation.
Games are tapping into some pretty fundamental elements of the human mind. I used to laugh when a videogame caused my body to release an adrenaline boost, like somehow it will help my virtual avatar dodge the next attack. Now I wonder why my mind is so easily fooled by flashing lights and sounds...
What other evolutionary gifts are left for game designers to tap into?
Taste?
Spacial Orientation and the Inner ear?
Smell?
Force Feedback (Although this is currently being worked on)
These questions bring me to the next section of this article.
****
All this Richard Dawkin's stuff has been very interesting. The Internet chugs along as the religious right and the liberal left do battle via forum, news site, podcast and youtube video. Following the debate has been great for me because it allows me to see the state of the art in Science vs Religion.
Yesterday night I was listening to another Dawkin's lecture and he started talking about his Middle World argument. (Not Middle Earth!) The middle world argument comes into play when discussing the ability of humans to grasp things beyond their current sensors. What is beyond our senses usually stuff that is fast, big, small or complicated. Middle World is the world we can see where things are slow, simple and medium sized.
I was excited when he started talking about this argument because I came up with exactly the same thing while writing a philosophy paper in the last year of my undergrad. Coming up with something on your own and finding out that somebody famous has already done it can be disappointing. However, I take comfort in the fact that if I keep learning and working things out on my own, perhaps I'll come up with something new.







